(solution) Microeconomics Research Paper I was thinking, The Economics of

(solution) Microeconomics Research Paper I was thinking, The Economics of

Microeconomics Research Paper

I was thinking, The Economics of Uber (Does Uber’s Surge Pricing Strategy Really Make Sense from an Economics Perspective), but was not set specifically on that topic.

APA format, scholarly and peer reviewed sources. No plagiarism.  If plagiarized will request a refund.  If receive an A, will give a $50 tip.

During the course, you are required to complete a formal written assignment highlighting published current economic events or issues and explain how they relate to theories learned in this course. The paper provides you an opportunity to realize, reflect, and explain the economics that exist all around us. The paper must include a graph used as an explanatory tool of the economic principle presented.

Early submissions of written assignments are always accepted, but use the links provided in the respective modules to submit your topic, draft, and final paper. Make use of the feedback you receive on your draft paper to improve your final paper before submitting it in Module 9.

Instructions for preparing this assignment are as follows:

1. Each paper is to be an analysis on the recent economic events or economic reports from the supplemental resources or references. The focus of this assignment is to relate and analyze current events to basic principles of microeconomics covered in this course. It is

not acceptable to just regurgitate statistics. The paper should indicate that you have a clear understanding of theory learned in class and its application/operation in the ?outside world.?

2. Option – If you come upon an interesting subject relating to your work or any other non-economic publication that can be explained in light of the theories learned in this class, you may be able to substitute this as the basis article. Discuss the article and ideas with your Instructor prior to embarking on this option.

3. Use standard file format (.doc or .docx) for all deliverables (topic, draft, and final paper). Standard margins apply. Papers should contain proper documentation of the article(s) or other references used. If direct quotes are used (not contained in the article), appropriate footnotes, endnotes, or parenthetical citations must accompany the quotes. Since a part of your paper will come from published sources, Internet references, etc., there should be sufficient evidence of where the information for your paper originated. Paper length should be a few pages – short enough to qualify as a commentary but long enough to adequately address the subject. Typically, six to eight double spaced pages are sufficient. Papers are graded on quality of content, not quantity. Standard APA style rules apply and clarity is important to your grade.

4. Paper grade will be broken down by the following standards:

Content 50%: reflection, explanation, implications of economic theory in practice,

Organization 20%: References, Bibliography, Works Cited, etc.,

Grammar and Spelling 10%: If you use Microsoft Word which has a spelling and grammar tool, it should be difficult to misspell a word, use the incorrect word, or incorrectly use the written English language. (This is even rarer if you reread your assignment before submitting.),

Readability 10%: ease and flow of ideas of your presentation, and

Format 10%: APA format applies. The paper should be properly set up with Title page, Thesis (or hypothesis), body (loaded with references), and a conclusion.

This assignment will comprise 20 percent of your grade.

This assignment is only submitted once for credit. There is not an option for revising this assignment and resubmitting for a higher grade.

Note: All papers submitted for grading in this course will be submitted to Turnitin, a plagiarism detection service, to check for originality so be sure to appropriately cite sources. Please review rules on self-plagiarism. The submission of what is essentially the same paper in more than one class without any indication that the paper has been published elsewhere (i.e., redundant and duplicate publication) and the practice of text recycling is considered plagiarism. APA formatting.

ECON210 Final Research Paper Rubric You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Focus – Application of Economic Theory 58426_4656 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
Paper makes great use applying economic theory to the topic (explaining the economics in the issue), includes economically logical conclusions, student excels at predicting future economic trends, events or conclusions based on the reasoning used.10.0 pts blank Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper makes good use applying economic theory to the topic (explaining the economics in the issue), may include basic economically logical conclusions/projections.8.0 pts 58426_9069 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper incorporates economic theory in explaining the topic (explaining the economics in the issue.) Little more than stating the economic theory is included. No use of economically logical conclusions.5.0 pts 58426_6248 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper makes no application of economic theory to the topic. Is just descriptive of the topic in nature. Provides no evidence student connected economic theory to topic.3.0 pts blank_2 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
Inclusion of Course Learning Outcomes 58426_4888 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
Paper makes great use of course material, readings, and supplements. Easily maps to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus.10.0 pts 58426_7643 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper makes good use of course material and readings. Little outside supplements are included. Maps to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus.8.0 pts 58426_9517 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper makes basic use of course material. Typically no outside supplements or research in included. Difficult to map to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus.5.0 pts 58426_6750 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper makes no real constructive use of course material. One could consider this an opinion paper with no real supporting material. Difficult to map to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus.3.0 pts 58426_1750 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
Inclusion of Supporting Data 58426_2686 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
Paper contains evidence of solid research effort drawing from many strong academic sources.10.0 pts 58426_2999 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper contains evidence of medium research effort in number and strength of resources.8.0 pts 58426_1515 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper contains evidence of minimal research effort or success drawing from few or weak sources (Wikipedia).5.0 pts 58426_5093 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper contains evidence of no real research effort including no real source of research.3.0 pts 58426_6761 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
Use of Statistical Evidence 58426_2450 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
Paper makes exemplary use of credible statistical evidence.10.0 pts 58426_8631 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Paper makes good use of credible statistical evidence.8.0 pts 58426_3164 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Statistical evidence is partial, weak or inappropriate.5.0 pts 58426_1696 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating No statistical evidence is presented.0.0 pts 58426_1917 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
Strength of Argumentation 58426_9885 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
Thesis is well developed and supported, feeds conclusion. Contradictory views plausibly handled.10.0 pts 58426_146 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Thesis is adequately developed and supported, only partially supports the conclusion. Contradictory views not treated adequately.8.0 pts 58426_3924 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Thesis is not adequately developed and logically supported, conclusion not supported. Contradictory views not treated.5.0 pts 58426_259 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Thesis is not developed or supported. Conclusion missing or not supported. Contradictory views not treated adequately.3.0 pts 58426_8619 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
References 58426_649 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
References are well documented in both the body and reference section in a consistent form. Many more than the minimum number of sources.15.0 pts 58426_8588 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating References are inconsistently documented in body and reference section. References are not ideally matched to content. Five sources and at least three journals contained.12.0 pts 58426_1826 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating References are poorly documented in body and reference section. References not appropriate to content or not current. Less than minimum requirements.8.0 pts 58426_9504 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Almost no references documented. Inappropriate references. Fewer than five sources or fewer than three journal articles. Reliance on nonquality web sources.5.0 pts 58426_5848 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 15.0 pts
Grammar 58426_5098 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
Writing is grammatically correct, clear and flowing.10.0 pts 58426_1954 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Writing should be polished for stronger presentation.8.0 pts 58426_937 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Writing needs work for clarity, organization and grammatical presentation.5.0 pts 58426_9968 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Clear indication that this is a draft with serious need for review and editing.2.0 pts 58426_1493 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
Spelling 58426_9786 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
No spelling errors that distract the reader from the content.5.0 pts 58426_8296 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Less than 1% of word total have errors in spelling that distract the reader from content.4.0 pts 58426_1078 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Frequent (3-4%) spelling errors that distract the reader from content.2.0 pts 58426_2286 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Significantly more than 4% spelling errors that distract the reader from the content.0.0 pts 58426_4230 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 5.0 pts
Flow of Thesis and Arguments 58426_475 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
Organization is logical and easy to follow. Includes introductory overview and supportable conclusion.10.0 pts 58426_7006 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Organization is evident but could be strengthened.8.0 pts 58426_8612 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Organization is weak. Introduction and conclusion are not clearly delineated in body of work.5.0 pts 58426_1193 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Organization is almost nonexistent and represents just a free flow of ideas.3.0 pts 58426_6436 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
APA Format 58426_4477 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description
APA style is employed perfectly.10.0 pts 58426_8001 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Few errors in APA style and most are inconsequential.8.0 pts 58426_6594 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Many features of APA style are ignored.5.0 pts 58426_9759 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating APA style ignored completely.0.0 pts 58426_2495 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 10.0 pts
Description of criterion view longer description threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description
Full Marks5 pts blank Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating No Marks0 pts blank_2 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts
  / 5 pts

Total Points: 100.0out of 100.0

ECONOMICS OF UBER
ECONOMICS OF UBER TAXI COMPANY
NAME:
REG. NO:
PROFESSOR:
DATE SUBMITTED: 1|Page ECONOMICS OF UBER
INTRODUCTION
In the past 30 years, the economic restructuring and technological…