an analytic process unrelated to issues.
coming up with claims, true or otherwise.
applying common sense to complex problems.
guiding us about critiquing thinking.
discovering what side you?re on.
determining exactly what the issue is.
realizing that all claims are equally valid.
win adherents to a position.
refute the positions of other people.
support or prove conclusions.
sound or unsound.
provable or unprovable.
strong or weak.
experiment and observations.
passions and emotions.
logic and reasoning.
elements of confusion.
conclusion or thesis of the passage.
intentions of the author.
rebut the arguments that support contrary positions.
state his/her position on the issue.
provide arguments that support his/her position on the issue.
syntactic; confusion caused by improper punctuation.
semantic; confusion caused by the meaning of semester.
semantic; confusion caused by groups with individuals in the group.
is generally more knowledgeable about a claim than others.
stands to gain from our acceptance of a claim.
has no stake in whether or not we believe claim.
positive or neutral; negative
promise of evidence without providing any support.
promise to nurture a claim following through on the promise.
the character of the person making the argument.
opposing the original claim.
who are expert but who might not have studied the issue.
on both sides of the issue.
plain and common sense term.
category and individual term.
subject and predicate term.
Block of exclusion
one of them is true and the other false.
the truth of one transfer to the other one.
the conclusion is true if the premise is false.
both of the claims cannot be false.
the two claims have the opposite truth value.
the two claims have unrelated truth values.
universal and particular
subject and predicate
A and B
less than equal
greater than equal
size and bias.
weight and volume.
similarities and dissimilarities.
gathered with enough patience
gathered with a specific purpose in mind
considered as part of a group of possible explanations.
included as the causal explanation.
considered a possible effect of another causal explanation.
feelings and intuitions.
outcomes and results.
religious commands and beliefs.
if it is based in accepted moral principles.
regardless, even if it means abandoning accepted moral principles.
usually the correct thing to do, but not always.
violating the consistency principle.?
anyone who is using moral reasoning.?
people who don?t reason about morals and just accept them at face value.?
This question was answered on: Sep 13, 2020Buy this answer for only: $15
This attachment is locked
Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .
About this QuestionSTATUS
Sep 13, 2020EXPERT
GET INSTANT HELP/h4>
We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.
You can also use these solutions:
- As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
- As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
- For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
NEW ASSIGNMENT HELP?
Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround
Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.
WE GUARANTEE, THAT YOUR PAPER WILL BE WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH AND WITHIN A DEADLINE.